|
PUP
Begins to Bear the Fruit of Divisiveness Here we are, barely across the threshold of a new year and already more is happening than can be conveyed to you in one letter. I'll begin with a status report on the harm that is emerging from the 2006 General Assembly's adoption of the Peace, Unity, and Purity Report (PUP). There is much to pray for and do. PUP Produces
New Problems from Cases Once Resolved: San Francisco In the aftermath of the 2006 General Assembly's adoption of the PUP Report and the authoritative interpretation of the Book of Order section on freedom of conscience (G-6.0108), Ms. Larges asked the Committee on Preparation for Ministry to reconsider her readiness. In December 2007, the committee, by a narrow vote of 12/9 voted to recommend that her departure from G-6.0106b not be considered a hindrance to her ordination. Rev. Mary Naegeli, immediate past co-Moderator of the Presbyterian Coalition, led the strong minority effort to maintain constitutional integrity in the presbytery. That group is seeking a stay of enforcement and remedial review of the decision by the Synod of the Pacific. A matter once resolved by the courts of the church is opened up again. New turmoil is created because of the ambiguity created by the new authoritative interpretation of the PUP Report.
Professor Capetz found new liberty under the PUP interpretation of the constitution to declare a "scruple of conscience" to G-6.0106b. The presbytery has called a special meeting on January 26, 2008 to determine whether Professor Capetz's departure from G-6.0106b constitutes a failure to adhere to the essentials of Reformed faith and polity, and whether the presbytery will restore him to the office of ordained ministry of Word and Sacrament. If the presbytery proceeds to reinstate Professor Capetz, there are presbyters who are ready to take their stand and pursue the matter in the courts of the church. This is the PUP legacy. And these two cases will not be the end of it. More are brewing in other presbyteries. Neither the Scripture nor the Presbyterian constitution have changed. But, because of PUP, prior decisions are now up for grabs and presbyteries will be going through the protracted turmoil of new court cases.
Terry
Schlossberg -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you know of others who should be receiving these emails, please send us their address. email:
terry@presbycoalition.org
|