Postmark deadlines
for overtures to the 216th GA, Birmingham, AL

120 day deadline:
February 15, 2006

(overtures requesting
amendment to or
interpretation of
the Book of Order)

60 day deadline:
April 17, 2006

(overtures having financial implications for current
or future budgets)

45 day deadline:
May 1, 2006

(all other overtures)

Overtures not received by
the applicable deadline will
be returned to the originating governing body.

Draft Overture Discarding any Sexuality Curricula
and Materials not Consistent with Biblical
and Confessional Teaching

Resolved, that the Presbytery of ________________ overtures the 217th General Assembly (2006) to declare the following: that concurring with the urgings of prior General Assemblies that the church guide our youth toward decisions of sexual purity, this 217th General Assembly directs the Congregational Ministries Division immediately to cease sales of and, within 90 days of the end of this General Assembly, to remove and discard all materials that fail to conform to the biblical and confessional standard of reserving sexual relationships to the marriage bond between a man and a woman,. Such removal and discarding would include, but not necessarily be limited to, all parts of the existing “God’s Gift of Sexuality” curriculum series for all ages, including student materials, leaders’ guides, parent guides, books, resource materials, and anything else associated with that curriculum. The Congregational Ministries Division shall report the items removed and the timely completion of the disposal of materials to the 218th General Assembly, and

Further, the 217th General Assembly directs the Congregational Ministries Division and all other PC(USA) entities to use the biblical and confessional teachings that sexual relationships belong only within the bond of the marriage of a man and a woman as the standard for the development of any future materials or recommendations for materials in print or on its website.

Rationale

The General Assemblies of 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2002 spoke to guiding our youth toward decisions of sexual purity and revising, rewriting, or otherwise correcting the existing PC(USA) sexuality curricula materials to reflect biblical and confessional teaching on this subject. Louisville offices have delayed action in this area well beyond an acceptable time frame and the reasonable patience of the General Assembly.

Youth are especially vulnerable to the messages concerning sexuality being sent by our culture in the various forms of media. Even many of our schools tend to send mixed messages in the formal instruction of youth with a lukewarm encouragement to delay sexual relationships while offering and even promoting contraception.

Scripture teaches the holiness of the sexual relationship in marriage. It values the body as a temple of the Holy Spirit and urges disciples of Christ to glorify God with our bodies. The biblical teaching also is intended to protect our children and youth from the abusive relationships and lifelong harm that result from sexual relationships outside the marriage relationship.

It is the church’s role to communicate faithfully the biblical message regarding sexual relationships to our children and youth and encourage parents in their desire to see their children grow into faithful disciples of Christ in thought, word, and deed.

Currently, some of the materials produced by denominational offices contain the same confusion of teaching that exists in the culture at large.* This is faithful neither to the biblical message nor to the General Assembly’s affirmation of its hopes for our youth. It is well past time to require that denominational offices, particularly with respect to the youth sexuality curricula—the God’s Gift of Sexuality series—discard all materials that do not conform to the biblical message. This is an area of curriculum development that has grown rapidly in the years since our denomination first initiated its own curriculum. There are now hundreds of curricula available from a variety of sources, through catalogues and websites, that teach a biblical view of sexuality and are produced specifically for use by churches.


*Examples of teaching in the current youth sexuality curricula

1. In answer to the question, "Should teenagers have sexual intercourse before marriage?" it says, "...We believe it is best to postpone intercourse until marriage. If a teenage couple decides to have a sexual relationship, they have the responsibility to use effective contraception" (Older Youth Guide, p. 10; Leader's Guide, pp. 17-18; Parent's Guide [elementary level], p. 41; Leader's Guide [elementary level], p. 105; Guide for Congregations [preschool level], p. 37). Thus, the curriculum strongly implies that a decision to engage in sexual relationships, if not best, is at least acceptable in the judgment of the church, as long as contraception is used.

2. The curriculum uses situational ethics in its approach to extramarital sex and ignores the Scripture’s clear teaching that sexual relationships outside the bond of marriage is sin. In answer to the question, "What does Jesus teach about extramarital sex?" it completely dodges the Christian response and says, "Jesus' teaching goes beyond the act to the state of the heart. Motivation and intent are the deciding factors...." (Older Youth Guide, p. 11; Leader's Guide, p. 18; Parent's Guide [elementary level], p. 42; Leader's Guide [elementary level], p. 106; Guide for Congregations [preschool level], p. 37).

3. The curriculum goes beyond what is known scientifically and ignores what is taught biblically by encouraging acceptance of homosexual orientation without distinguishing orientation from practice. In answer to the question, "Are people either homosexual or heterosexual?" it says, "It is believed that most people exist somewhere on a continuum that ranges from an exclusively heterosexual orientation to one that is exclusively homosexual" (Older Youth Guide, p 13; Leader's Guide, p. 20; Parent's Guide [elementary level], p. 44; Leader's Guide [elementary level], p. 108; Guide for Congregations [preschool level], p. 39. The answer fails to state the Scripture’s and the church’s clear teaching on homosexual practice.

4. The curriculum fails to instruct our children and youth in exactly what our denomination has explicitly and repeatedly stated regarding marriage, extra-marital sex, and homosexual sex. In answer to the question, "Is there disagreement with this understanding of homosexuality within our church?" it says, "...The stand of our church is to encourage all church members to continue dialogue within the church. We believe there is always the possibility for more light to break forth from God's Spirit to aid our understanding." (Older Youth Guide, pp. 14-15; Leader's Guide, pp. 21-22; Parent's Guide [elementary level], p. 45; Leader's Guide [elementary level], p. 109; Guide for Congregations [preschool level], p. 41). Again, this deficient answer dodges the question and fails to offer the church’s clear counsel on a matter of crucial importance.

Return to Coalition Home Page