Preamble to Amendment B
(to enact G-6.0106b in the Constitution) from the Assembly Committee on
Ordination and Human Sexuality, approved by the 208th General Assembly (1996):
[1] We, The Assembly Committee on Ordination and Human Sexuality,
are thankful for the opportunity to hear from the whole church in all its
diversity, as we work to maintain a spirit of compassion and unity on difficult
issues that have occasioned much discussion and pain in the church. The committee had before it numerous
overtures and addresses, and listened long and hard to the voices speaking on
so many different aspects of ordination and human sexuality. In listening, the committee also heard many
related questions involving polity, the confessions, and the constitutional
status of authoritative interpretation in the church.
[2] We struggled with a way to maintain the unity of the Spirit
in the bond of peace. We have concluded
that now is the time to allow the church at the grass roots through its
presbyteries to study and decide whether it is God’s will to ordain
self-affirming, practicing, homosexual persons to the office of deacon, elder,
or minister of the Word and Sacrament in the Presbyterian Church (U. S.
A.). While it may be important for
presbyteries and future General Assemblies to discuss matters of polity and
interpretation, we are recommending that presbyteries should be asked at this
time to discuss and vote on the issue of ordination and sexuality.
[3] We hear the church’s desire to send a clear word that speaks
to the moral confusion in our culture.
In order to speak well, the committee is recommending, first, that the
assembly pray. Second, that we send to
the presbyteries for their affirmative or negative vote, the following
amendment to the Book of Order, G-6.0106, to renumber the present
paragraph as “a” and by adding a new section “b” to read as follows:
[4] “b. Those who are called to office in the church
are to lead a life in obedience to Scripture and in conformity to the historic
confessional standards of the church.
Among these standards is the requirement to live either in fidelity
within the covenant of marriage of one man and one woman (W-4.9001), or chastity in singleness. Persons refusing to repent of any
self-acknowledged practice which the confessions call sin shall not be ordained
and/or installed as deacons, elders, or ministers of the Word and Sacrament.”
[5] The committee believes that this language best expresses our
understanding of Scripture as guided by the confessions and the historic
practice of this church, in unity with the Church universal and
ecumenical. We believe we have spoken to
the concerns of almost all of the overtures in making this recommendation.
[6] In sending this resolution, we as a church are acting like
Jesus, who loves all persons, who did not come to condemn anyone, but calls all
to repentance, turning from sin. The
Church must not be an exclusive, condemning community; it must be a community
of welcome and love.
[7] The issue before this church is not a question of membership,
but of office. Active membership is
inclusive of all who have faith in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord.
Through listening to the pain of its members, the church
has learned to distinguish between homosexual orientation and practice. Homosexual orientation is not a sin; neither
is it a barrier to ordination. However,
the refusal to repent of any self-acknowledged practice that Scripture,
interpreted through the confessions, calls sin, bars one from office.
[8] Ordination is not a “right.”
It is a call to a particular function within the church. It requires prayerful discernment, by
congregations and presbyteries, of those whose “manner of life” is a “demonstration
of the Christian gospel” (G-6.0106).
Where there is sin, repentance leads to grace which demonstrates that
gospel. Where sin remains unacknowledged
and unrepentant, there can be no ordination.
The standards are high.
[9] Is homosexual practice sin?
We listened to many who are struggling with
that question. Faithful people differ in
their understandings of Scripture.
Homosexual behavior is listed in the Bible with sins that include adultery,
fornication, pride, greed, lust, jealousy, and malice. Although it is not a greater sin than any
other, we believe that Scripture, as guided by the confessions, defines such
practice as sin.
[10] The foundational issue is biblical authority. All of us believe the Bible to be
authoritative and attempt to be faithful to God’s revealed will in the
Scriptures as guided by the confessions.
Our Constitution declares that it is “necessary to the integrity
and health of the church” that officers “adhere to the
essentials of the Reformed faith and polity as express in The Book of
Confessions and the Form of Government” (G-6.0108a). While “God alone is Lord of the conscience”
(G-1.0301), ordained officers choose to exercise this freedom “within certain
bounds.” Their “conscience is captive to
the Word of God as interpreted in the standards of the church . . .”
(G-6.0108b). Officers vow to be led by
the confessions “as authentic and reliable expositions of what Scripture leads
us to believe and do” (G-14.0207c). We
are a confessional church, under the authority of the Word of God, the guidance
of The Book of Confessions, and under the church’s discipline. It is not the intention of this committee,
through this recommendation to the presbyteries, to change anything in the
church’s present standards and polity in relation to divorce and remarriage.
[11] The committee heard from many in the church who believed that
the best road to unity would be to allow the decisions on ordination to be
decided solely by congregations, sessions, and presbyteries. We agree with the Advisory Committee on the
Constitution that this would be a fundamental, substantive, and far-reaching
change in the foundation principles of a connectional church, as expressed
especially in the Form of Government, “the historic principles of church
government” (G-1.0400). Ordination is
for the whole church. Any form of “local
option” would abandon our historic and distinctive foundation as a confessional
and connectional church. We must hold
both of these together in order to maintain the peace, unity, and purity of the
church.
[12] We conclude by calling on the church to be that listening,
learning, and healing community that Christ commands us to be, and we call the
church to encourage ministries of compassion and healing for all persons.
[Numbers for paragraphs added to facilitate referencing.]